Athletic Club
SevillaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Athletic Club created more (1.46 xG against 0.97) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.46 | −0.5 | 1.72 | |
| 3 | 0.97 | +2.0 | 1.02 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14' | Oso | 0.34 | ||
| 50' | Chidera Ejuke | 0.30 | Isaac Romero | |
| 56' | Isaac Romero | 0.14 | Oso | |
| 69' | Aitor Paredes | 0.53 | Yeray Álvarez |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69' | Aitor Paredes | 0.53 | goal, from a corner | |
| 14' | Oso | 0.34 | goal | |
| 50' | Chidera Ejuke | 0.30 | goal |
Shots: Athletic Club 18, Sevilla 7; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 2.
In the first half xG was Athletic Club 0.39, Sevilla 0.53: about even. In the second half xG was Athletic Club 1.12, Sevilla 0.44: a small edge for Athletic Club. Sevilla scored 3 from 0.97 xG: well above what they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Athletic Club: −4.2 for the season (7 in the table). Sevilla: +2.5 (6). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.