Barcelona
Athletic ClubThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Barcelona was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3.92 | −1.9 | 2.92 | |
| 0 | 0.22 | −0.2 | 0.05 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36' | Raphinha | 0.59 | Pedri | |
| 81' | Fermín López | 0.92 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81' | Fermín López | 0.92 | goal | |
| 36' | Raphinha | 0.59 | goal | |
| 87' | Karim Adeyemi | 0.58 | saved |
Shots: Barcelona 22, Athletic Club 5; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 5 and 0.
In the first half xG was Barcelona 1.82, Athletic Club 0.02: a big edge for Barcelona. In the second half xG was Barcelona 2.13, Athletic Club 0.20: a big edge for Barcelona. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Barcelona scored 2 from 3.92 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Barcelona: +3.7 for the season (1 in the table). Athletic Club: −4.2 (7). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.