Celta Vigo
Athletic ClubThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Athletic Club was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.20 | −1.2 | 0.47 | |
| 2 | 3.13 | −1.1 | 2.39 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19' | Alex Berenguer | 0.07 | Iñaki Williams | |
| 21' | Roberto Navarro | 0.48 | Inigo Ruiz de Galarreta |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34' | Iñaki Williams | 0.54 | saved | |
| 17' | Aymeric Laporte | 0.52 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 21' | Roberto Navarro | 0.48 | goal |
Shots: Celta Vigo 8, Athletic Club 17; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 5.
In the first half xG was Celta Vigo 0.46, Athletic Club 2.42: a big edge for Athletic Club. In the second half xG was Celta Vigo 0.74, Athletic Club 0.72: about even. Celta Vigo scored 0 from 1.20 xG: fewer than they created. Athletic Club scored 2 from 3.13 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Celta Vigo: −2.7 for the season (11 in the table). Athletic Club: −4.2 (7). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.