Getafe
Racing SantanderThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Racing Santander created more (1.17 xG against 0.98) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.98 | +0.0 | 1.21 | |
| 0 | 1.17 | −1.2 | 1.50 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80' | Enes Ünal | 0.65 | goal | |
| 58' | Andrés Martín | 0.22 | saved | |
| 67' | Andrés Martín | 0.08 | off target |
Shots: Getafe 12, Racing Santander 6; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Getafe 0.15, Racing Santander 0.10: about even. In the second half xG was Getafe 0.83, Racing Santander 1.07: about even. Racing Santander scored 0 from 1.17 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Getafe: +1.4 for the season (15 in the table). Racing Santander: +0.3 (10). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.