Cagliari
LecceThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Cagliari was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Daniel Maldini | 0.48 | Jacopo Fazzini |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Daniel Maldini | 0.48 | goal, header, from a corner | |
| 45' | Paul Mendy | 0.37 | hit the woodwork | |
| 81' | Alessandro Sugamele | 0.26 | saved |
Shots: Cagliari 20, Lecce 10; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 0.
In the first half xG was Cagliari 1.08, Lecce 0.21: a clear edge for Cagliari. In the second half xG was Cagliari 0.86, Lecce 0.23: a small edge for Cagliari. The edge in chances lasted the whole match.
Cagliari: +5.0 for the season (9 in the table). Lecce: +1.1 (14). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.