Arsenal
ChelseaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Arsenal was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1' | Morgan Rogers | 0.04 | Jorrel Hato | |
| 24' | Kai Havertz | 0.04 | Declan Rice | |
| 49' | Martin Odegaard | 0.56 | Christos Tzolis |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49' | Martin Odegaard | 0.56 | goal | |
| 11' | Gabriel | 0.52 | saved, from a set piece | |
| 4' | Riccardo Calafiori | 0.48 | saved, from a set piece |
Shots: Arsenal 16, Chelsea 13; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 0.
In the first half xG was Arsenal 1.92, Chelsea 0.15: a big edge for Arsenal. In the second half xG was Arsenal 0.96, Chelsea 0.28: a small edge for Arsenal. The edge in chances lasted the whole match.
Arsenal: +8.0 for the season (1 in the table). Chelsea: +3.2 (5). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.