Rayo Vallecano
Racing SantanderThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Rayo Vallecano was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1.19 | +1.8 | 1.80 | |
| 2 | 0.63 | +1.4 | 0.90 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3' | Sergio Canales | 0.06 | ||
| 16' | Andrei Ratiu | 0.04 | Sergio Camello | |
| 27' | Pablo García | 0.02 | ||
| 42' | Sergio Camello | 0.37 | Unai López | |
| 46' | Sergio Camello | 0.04 | Unai López |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42' | Sergio Camello | 0.37 | goal | |
| 15' | Pablo García | 0.33 | saved | |
| 49' | Andrei Ratiu | 0.13 | blocked |
Shots: Rayo Vallecano 16, Racing Santander 9; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Rayo Vallecano 0.73, Racing Santander 0.46: about even. In the second half xG was Rayo Vallecano 0.45, Racing Santander 0.18: about even. Rayo Vallecano scored 3 from 1.19 xG: well above what they created. Racing Santander scored 2 from 0.63 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Rayo Vallecano: −1.5 for the season (14 in the table). Racing Santander: +0.3 (10). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.