Real Betis
GetafeThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Real Betis was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.61 | −1.6 | 2.69 | |
| 0 | 0.33 | −0.3 | 0.20 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44' | Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | 0.47 | Troy Parrott |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84' | Antony | 0.60 | blocked | |
| 44' | Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | 0.47 | goal | |
| 50' | Isco | 0.41 | off target |
Shots: Real Betis 22, Getafe 8; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 0.
In the first half xG was Real Betis 0.81, Getafe 0.14: a small edge for Real Betis. In the second half xG was Real Betis 1.79, Getafe 0.18: a big edge for Real Betis. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Real Betis scored 1 from 2.61 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Real Betis: +7.9 for the season (4 in the table). Getafe: +1.4 (15). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.