Rennes
MarseilleThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Rennes was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52' | Adrien Thomasson | 0.56 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52' | Adrien Thomasson | 0.56 | goal | |
| 71' | Adrien Thomasson | 0.47 | hit the woodwork | |
| 57' | Pierre-Emile Højbjerg | 0.41 | saved |
Shots: Rennes 20, Marseille 13; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 3 and 2.
In the first half xG was Rennes 0.57, Marseille 0.27: about even. In the second half xG was Rennes 1.75, Marseille 1.04: a small edge for Rennes. Rennes scored 1 from 2.32 xG: fewer than they created. Marseille scored 0 from 1.31 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Rennes: −0.3 for the season (8 in the table). Marseille: +5.6 (4). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.