Krylia Sovetov
Fakel VoronezhThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Krylia Sovetov created more (1.60 xG against 0.68) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.60 | −0.6 | 2.03 | |
| 2 | 0.68 | +1.3 | 0.72 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16' | Clayton Sampaio | 0.04 | Ilnur Alshin | |
| 24' | Martin Kramaric | 0.29 | Kirill Pechenin | |
| 66' | Matvey Bardachev | 0.19 | Ilnur Alshin |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31' | Yuri Gorshkov | 0.30 | off target | |
| 24' | Martin Kramaric | 0.29 | goal, header | |
| 66' | Matvey Bardachev | 0.19 | goal, header, from a corner |
Shots: Krylia Sovetov 21, Fakel Voronezh 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 0.
In the first half xG was Krylia Sovetov 1.08, Fakel Voronezh 0.26: a clear edge for Krylia Sovetov. In the second half xG was Krylia Sovetov 0.51, Fakel Voronezh 0.42: about even. Fakel Voronezh scored 2 from 0.68 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Krylia Sovetov: −4.0 for the season (7 in the table). Fakel Voronezh: −6.5 (16). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.