AC Milan
VeneziaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: AC Milan was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68' | Gonçalo Ramos | 0.36 | Alexis Saelemaekers | |
| 88' | Redouane Halal (own goal) | — |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54' | Yunus Musah | 0.60 | hit the woodwork, from a set piece | |
| 88' | Ardon Jashari | 0.52 | saved | |
| 59' | Gonçalo Ramos | 0.51 | off target, header |
Shots: AC Milan 16, Venezia 9; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 5 and 0.
In the first half xG was AC Milan 0.99, Venezia 0.18: a clear edge for AC Milan. In the second half xG was AC Milan 2.25, Venezia 0.33: a big edge for AC Milan. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. AC Milan scored 2 from 3.22 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
AC Milan: +5.8 for the season (4 in the table). Venezia: −5.9 (19). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.