Cagliari
InterThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Inter was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8' | Hakan Calhanoglu | 0.03 | Nicolò Barella |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52' | Francesco Pio Esposito | 0.59 | saved | |
| 27' | Federico Dimarco | 0.30 | saved | |
| 43' | Federico Dimarco | 0.30 | off target |
Shots: Cagliari 10, Inter 31; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 3.
In the first half xG was Cagliari 0.00, Inter 1.84: a big edge for Inter. In the second half xG was Cagliari 0.32, Inter 2.14: a big edge for Inter. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Inter scored 1 from 3.97 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Cagliari: +5.0 for the season (9 in the table). Inter: +2.0 (2). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.