Napoli
ComoThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Como was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16' | Martin Baturina | 0.13 | Assane Diao | |
| 29' | Rasmus Højlund | 0.07 | Amir Rrahmani | |
| 33' | Tasos Douvikas | 0.09 | Martin Baturina |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18' | Noa Lang | 0.28 | off target, header | |
| 5' | Scott McTominay | 0.16 | blocked | |
| 16' | Martin Baturina | 0.13 | goal |
Shots: Napoli 13, Como 21; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Napoli 0.72, Como 0.60: about even. In the second half xG was Napoli 0.33, Como 0.50: about even.
Napoli: −7.2 for the season (10 in the table). Como: +3.2 (5). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.