Genoa
ComoThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Como was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18' | Milutin Osmajic | 0.43 | Lorenzo Colombo | |
| 24' | Martin Baturina | 0.03 | Álex Valle | |
| 29' | Assane Diao | 0.07 | ||
| 39' | Nico Paz | 0.31 | Yan Couto | |
| 77' | Assane Diao | 0.31 | Moise Kean |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64' | Tasos Douvikas | 0.49 | off target, header | |
| 18' | Milutin Osmajic | 0.43 | goal | |
| 39' | Nico Paz | 0.31 | goal |
Shots: Genoa 11, Como 20; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 3.
In the first half xG was Genoa 0.57, Como 0.96: a small edge for Como. In the second half xG was Genoa 0.34, Como 1.07: a small edge for Como. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Como scored 4 from 2.01 xG: well above what they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Genoa: +0.7 for the season (13 in the table). Como: +3.2 (5). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.