Chelsea
Tottenham HotspurThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Tottenham Hotspur was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.46 | −0.5 | 0.86 | |
| 2 | 0.98 | +1.0 | 1.78 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76' | Mike Penders (own goal) | — | ||
| 86' | Mathys Tel | 0.03 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Omar Marmoush | 0.39 | saved | |
| 32' | Morgan Rogers | 0.12 | blocked | |
| 54' | Mathys Tel | 0.11 | blocked, header, from a corner |
Shots: Chelsea 7, Tottenham Hotspur 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Chelsea 0.25, Tottenham Hotspur 0.59: a small edge for Tottenham Hotspur. In the second half xG was Chelsea 0.21, Tottenham Hotspur 0.39: about even. Tottenham Hotspur scored 2 from 0.98 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Chelsea: +3.2 for the season (5 in the table). Tottenham Hotspur: −2.3 (11). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.