Aston Villa
Manchester CityThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Aston Villa won against the run of chances: Manchester City created more (2.29 xG against 0.65).
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.65 | +1.4 | 0.43 | |
| 1 | 2.29 | −1.3 | 2.40 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5' | Nicolas Jackson | 0.12 | John McGinn | |
| 51' | Erling Haaland | 0.53 | Iliman Ndiaye | |
| 59' | Nicolas Jackson | 0.08 | Ibrahim Mbaye |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51' | Erling Haaland | 0.53 | goal, header, from a set piece | |
| 67' | Josko Gvardiol | 0.53 | saved | |
| 20' | Mathis Cherki | 0.39 | saved |
Shots: Aston Villa 8, Manchester City 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 4.
In the first half xG was Aston Villa 0.47, Manchester City 0.58: about even. In the second half xG was Aston Villa 0.18, Manchester City 1.68: a big edge for Manchester City. Aston Villa scored 2 from 0.65 xG: more than they created. Manchester City scored 1 from 2.29 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Aston Villa: +2.5 for the season (10 in the table). Manchester City: +0.1 (3). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.