Coventry City
FulhamThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Fulham was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.40 | −0.4 | 1.09 | |
| 1 | 0.57 | +0.4 | 1.44 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79' | Oscar Bobb | 0.05 | Joshua King |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22' | Gonzalo García | 0.09 | blocked | |
| 12' | Gonzalo García | 0.08 | blocked | |
| 17' | Alex Iwobi | 0.07 | off target |
Shots: Coventry City 13, Fulham 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Coventry City 0.24, Fulham 0.41: about even. In the second half xG was Coventry City 0.16, Fulham 0.15: about even.
Coventry City: −0.8 for the season (17 in the table). Fulham: −3.9 (15). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.