Liverpool
Manchester CityThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Manchester City was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.76 | −0.8 | 0.78 | |
| 3 | 1.59 | +1.4 | 1.97 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64' | Erling Haaland | 0.09 | ||
| 67' | Jéremy Doku | 0.06 | Elliot Anderson | |
| 77' | Mathis Cherki | 0.75 | Josko Gvardiol |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77' | Mathis Cherki | 0.75 | goal | |
| 59' | Erling Haaland | 0.26 | off target | |
| 20' | Jérémy Jacquet | 0.13 | saved, from a corner |
Shots: Liverpool 13, Manchester City 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Liverpool 0.33, Manchester City 0.08: about even. In the second half xG was Liverpool 0.42, Manchester City 1.51: a clear edge for Manchester City. Manchester City scored 3 from 1.59 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Liverpool: +3.1 for the season (4 in the table). Manchester City: +0.1 (3). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.