Manchester City
BournemouthThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Manchester City was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2.47 | −0.5 | 2.43 | |
| 1 | 0.71 | +0.3 | 0.41 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25' | Marcus Tavernier | 0.44 | Evanilson | |
| 83' | Marc Guehi | 0.11 | Mathis Cherki | |
| 90' | Josko Gvardiol | 0.41 | Mathis Cherki |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50' | Marc Guehi | 0.53 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 74' | Erling Haaland | 0.48 | saved | |
| 25' | Marcus Tavernier | 0.44 | goal |
Shots: Manchester City 13, Bournemouth 5; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 1.
In the first half xG was Manchester City 0.76, Bournemouth 0.63: about even. In the second half xG was Manchester City 1.72, Bournemouth 0.08: a big edge for Manchester City.
Manchester City: +0.1 for the season (3 in the table). Bournemouth: −3.6 (7). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.