Sunderland
FulhamThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Sunderland was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.56 | −0.6 | 1.75 | |
| 0 | 1.02 | −1.0 | 1.00 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74' | Wilson Isidor | 0.45 | Habib Diarra |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70' | Wilson Isidor | 0.54 | hit the woodwork | |
| 74' | Wilson Isidor | 0.45 | goal | |
| 56' | Gonzalo García | 0.32 | blocked |
Shots: Sunderland 12, Fulham 11; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 1.
In the first half xG was Sunderland 0.15, Fulham 0.30: about even. In the second half xG was Sunderland 1.40, Fulham 0.72: a small edge for Sunderland. Fulham scored 0 from 1.02 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Sunderland: −6.2 for the season (19 in the table). Fulham: −3.9 (15). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.