Chelsea
BrightonThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Chelsea was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3' | Romeo Lavia | 0.64 | ||
| 13' | Pedro Neto | 0.60 | Morgan Rogers | |
| 31' | João Pedro | 0.50 | Jorrel Hato | |
| 34' | Malick Yalcouyé | 0.34 | ||
| 62' | João Pedro (own goal) | — | ||
| 73' | Cole Palmer | 0.05 | João Pedro | |
| 95' | Pascal Groß | 0.05 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57' | Cole Palmer | 0.67 | off target | |
| 3' | Romeo Lavia | 0.64 | goal, from a corner | |
| 13' | Pedro Neto | 0.60 | goal |
Shots: Chelsea 17, Brighton 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 5 and 3.
In the first half xG was Chelsea 2.67, Brighton 1.42: a clear edge for Chelsea. In the second half xG was Chelsea 1.24, Brighton 0.45: a small edge for Chelsea. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Brighton scored 3 from 1.79 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Chelsea: +3.2 for the season (5 in the table). Brighton: +3.8 (2). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.