Tottenham Hotspur
Newcastle UnitedThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Tottenham Hotspur created more (1.12 xG against 1.01) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.12 | −1.1 | 1.44 | |
| 2 | 1.01 | +1.0 | 1.27 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61' | Anthony Elanga | 0.08 | Amar Dedic | |
| 71' | Yoane Wissa | 0.51 | Nick Woltemade |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71' | Yoane Wissa | 0.51 | goal, from a corner | |
| 36' | Jan Paul van Hecke | 0.30 | saved, header, from a corner | |
| 16' | Pedro Porro | 0.13 | blocked |
Shots: Tottenham Hotspur 17, Newcastle United 11; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Tottenham Hotspur 0.69, Newcastle United 0.34: a small edge for Tottenham Hotspur. In the second half xG was Tottenham Hotspur 0.43, Newcastle United 0.69: about even. Tottenham Hotspur scored 0 from 1.12 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Tottenham Hotspur: −2.3 for the season (11 in the table). Newcastle United: +2.1 (12). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.