Racing Santander
Real MadridThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Real Madrid was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.69 | −0.7 | 0.24 | |
| 3 | 3.22 | −0.2 | 2.66 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10' | Kylian Mbappe-Lottin (penalty) | 0.74 | ||
| 21' | Jude Bellingham | 0.55 | Arda Güler | |
| 35' | Yan Diomande | 0.02 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21' | Jude Bellingham | 0.55 | goal | |
| 9' | Jude Bellingham | 0.43 | saved, header | |
| 23' | Arda Güler | 0.27 | saved |
Shots: Racing Santander 10, Real Madrid 22; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 3.
In the first half xG was Racing Santander 0.26, Real Madrid 2.56: a big edge for Real Madrid. In the second half xG was Racing Santander 0.42, Real Madrid 0.66: about even.
Racing Santander: +0.3 for the season (10 in the table). Real Madrid: +2.3 (2). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.