Getafe
SevillaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Getafe was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18' | Kike Salas | 0.05 | Felix Correia | |
| 67' | Enes Ünal | 0.43 | Martín Satriano | |
| 73' | Martín Satriano | 0.50 | Enes Ünal | |
| 93' | Orel Mangala | 0.10 | Andrés García |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73' | Martín Satriano | 0.50 | goal | |
| 67' | Enes Ünal | 0.43 | goal | |
| 82' | Martín Satriano | 0.15 | off target, header |
Shots: Getafe 11, Sevilla 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 0.
In the first half xG was Getafe 0.09, Sevilla 0.37: about even. In the second half xG was Getafe 1.49, Sevilla 0.37: a clear edge for Getafe. Getafe scored 3 from 1.58 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Getafe: +1.4 for the season (15 in the table). Sevilla: +2.5 (6). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.