Elche
ValenciaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Elche created more (1.27 xG against 1.18) and left with nothing.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68' | Umar Sadiq | 0.73 | Arnaut Danjuma Groeneveld |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68' | Umar Sadiq | 0.73 | goal | |
| 93' | Federico Redondo | 0.35 | saved, header, from a set piece | |
| 65' | Umar Sadiq | 0.30 | saved |
Shots: Elche 16, Valencia 5; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 2.
In the first half xG was Elche 0.30, Valencia 0.06: about even. In the second half xG was Elche 0.98, Valencia 1.12: about even. Elche scored 0 from 1.27 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Elche: −3.7 for the season (18 in the table). Valencia: −3.7 (19). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.