Le Havre
BrestThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Brest was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11' | Kamory Doumbia (penalty) | 0.76 | ||
| 50' | Kamory Doumbia | 0.62 | Mama Baldé | |
| 78' | Rayan Fofana (penalty) | 0.76 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50' | Kamory Doumbia | 0.62 | goal | |
| 62' | Kamory Doumbia | 0.57 | off target | |
| 90' | Joris Chotard | 0.14 | saved |
Shots: Le Havre 18, Brest 19; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 3.
In the first half xG was Le Havre 0.46, Brest 1.18: a small edge for Brest. In the second half xG was Le Havre 1.16, Brest 1.84: a small edge for Brest. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Brest scored 2 from 3.01 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Le Havre: −8.0 for the season (18 in the table). Brest: −3.8 (9). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.