Orenburg
ZenitThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Zenit was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.21 | Pedro Henrique | |
| 57' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.03 | ||
| 65' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.09 | Jhon Jhon |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.21 | goal | |
| 93' | Andrey Mostovoy | 0.16 | saved | |
| 70' | Alexandre Jesus | 0.10 | off target |
Shots: Orenburg 13, Zenit 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Orenburg 0.20, Zenit 0.44: about even. In the second half xG was Orenburg 0.33, Zenit 0.36: about even. Zenit scored 3 from 0.81 xG: well above what they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Orenburg: −3.3 for the season (10 in the table). Zenit: +5.4 (1). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.