Rostov
Fakel VoronezhThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Rostov was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1.66 | +1.3 | 2.20 | |
| 1 | 0.51 | +0.5 | 0.56 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55' | Alexey Mironov | 0.45 | Olakunle Olusegun | |
| 58' | Konstantin Kuchaev | 0.04 | Timur Suleymanov | |
| 63' | Oumar Sako | 0.49 | Alexey Mironov | |
| 88' | Aleksandr Koksharov | 0.07 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63' | Oumar Sako | 0.49 | goal, header, from a corner | |
| 13' | Viktor Melekhin | 0.47 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 55' | Alexey Mironov | 0.45 | goal |
Shots: Rostov 9, Fakel Voronezh 9; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 3 and 0.
In the first half xG was Rostov 0.51, Fakel Voronezh 0.26: about even. In the second half xG was Rostov 1.15, Fakel Voronezh 0.26: a clear edge for Rostov. Rostov scored 3 from 1.66 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Rostov: +2.2 for the season (6 in the table). Fakel Voronezh: −6.5 (16). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.