Rodina Moscow
KrasnodarThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Rodina Moscow was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1.18 | +0.8 | 1.72 | |
| 1 | 0.71 | +0.3 | 0.97 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63' | Christian | 0.04 | Dmitry Vorobyev | |
| 68' | German Onugkha | 0.38 | Andrey Egorychev | |
| 85' | Douglas Augusto (own goal) | — |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3' | German Onugkha | 0.38 | saved, header | |
| 68' | German Onugkha | 0.38 | goal | |
| 88' | Dmitry Vorobyev | 0.13 | hit the woodwork |
Shots: Rodina Moscow 11, Krasnodar 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 0.
In the first half xG was Rodina Moscow 0.53, Krasnodar 0.17: a small edge for Rodina Moscow. In the second half xG was Rodina Moscow 0.66, Krasnodar 0.54: about even.
Rodina Moscow: −0.3 for the season (13 in the table). Krasnodar: +6.6 (4). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.