Rubin Kazan
Fakel VoronezhThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Rubin Kazan was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.73 | +0.3 | 1.60 | |
| 0 | 0.41 | −0.4 | 0.98 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37' | Eddie Salcedo | 0.12 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50' | Nikita Lobov | 0.13 | saved | |
| 33' | Eddie Salcedo | 0.12 | off target, header | |
| 37' | Eddie Salcedo | 0.12 | goal |
Shots: Rubin Kazan 9, Fakel Voronezh 8; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Rubin Kazan 0.55, Fakel Voronezh 0.20: a small edge for Rubin Kazan. In the second half xG was Rubin Kazan 0.19, Fakel Voronezh 0.21: about even.
Rubin Kazan: +2.1 for the season (8 in the table). Fakel Voronezh: −6.5 (16). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.