Zenit
Dynamo MoscowThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Zenit was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1.22 | +1.8 | 1.94 | |
| 0 | 0.49 | −0.5 | 0.75 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28' | Alexander Sobolev (penalty) | 0.75 | ||
| 32' | Alexander Sobolev | 0.44 | Maksim Glushenkov | |
| 86' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.03 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32' | Alexander Sobolev | 0.44 | goal | |
| 16' | Iaroslav Gladyshev | 0.14 | off target, header | |
| 78' | Maksim Osipenko | 0.12 | saved |
Shots: Zenit 3, Dynamo Moscow 11; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 0.
In the first half xG was Zenit 1.19, Dynamo Moscow 0.30: a clear edge for Zenit. In the second half xG was Zenit 0.03, Dynamo Moscow 0.19: about even. Zenit scored 3 from 1.22 xG: well above what they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Zenit: +5.4 for the season (1 in the table). Dynamo Moscow: +7.3 (2). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.