Como
ParmaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Como was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22' | Jacobo Ramón | 0.87 | Nico Paz | |
| 82' | Kaiki | 0.33 | Máximo Perrone | |
| 91' | David Romero | 0.31 | Pontus Almqvist |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22' | Jacobo Ramón | 0.87 | goal, from a corner | |
| 66' | David Romero | 0.53 | hit the woodwork | |
| 82' | Tasos Douvikas | 0.52 | saved |
Shots: Como 28, Parma 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 3.
In the first half xG was Como 1.46, Parma 0.48: a clear edge for Como. In the second half xG was Como 2.35, Parma 1.08: a clear edge for Como. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Como scored 2 from 3.77 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Como: +3.2 for the season (5 in the table). Parma: +0.8 (16). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.