Parma
CagliariThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Cagliari was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78' | Alessandro Romano | 0.02 | Ndary Adopo |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6' | Niakhate Ndiaye | 0.45 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 36' | Zé Pedro | 0.34 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 45' | Alessandro Deiola | 0.26 | off target, header, from a set piece |
Shots: Parma 12, Cagliari 14; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Parma 0.65, Cagliari 0.87: about even. In the second half xG was Parma 0.37, Cagliari 0.39: about even. Parma scored 0 from 1.03 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Parma: +0.8 for the season (16 in the table). Cagliari: +5.0 (9). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.