Bournemouth
SunderlandThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Bournemouth was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.39 | −2.4 | 2.96 | |
| 0 | 0.09 | −0.1 | 0.02 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5' | Marcus Tavernier | 0.34 | Evanilson | |
| 47' | Evanilson | 0.63 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47' | Evanilson | 0.63 | goal | |
| 31' | Adam Smith | 0.50 | off target | |
| 60' | Marcus Tavernier | 0.42 | saved |
Shots: Bournemouth 29, Sunderland 3; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 6 and 0.
In the first half xG was Bournemouth 1.93, Sunderland 0.04: a big edge for Bournemouth. In the second half xG was Bournemouth 2.49, Sunderland 0.05: a big edge for Bournemouth. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Bournemouth scored 2 from 4.39 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Bournemouth: −3.6 for the season (7 in the table). Sunderland: −6.2 (19). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.