Nottingham Forest
ArsenalThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Arsenal was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.75 | −0.8 | 1.19 | |
| 1 | 0.92 | +0.1 | 1.47 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79' | Noni Madueke | 0.04 | Declan Rice |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66' | Gabriel | 0.37 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 25' | Gabriel | 0.11 | blocked, from a corner | |
| 71' | Declan Rice | 0.11 | off target |
Shots: Nottingham Forest 14, Arsenal 9; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Nottingham Forest 0.14, Arsenal 0.26: about even. In the second half xG was Nottingham Forest 0.60, Arsenal 0.66: about even.
Nottingham Forest: −8.6 for the season (16 in the table). Arsenal: +8.0 (1). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.