Crystal Palace
Newcastle UnitedThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Crystal Palace created more (2.03 xG against 1.30) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.03 | −2.0 | 1.84 | |
| 2 | 1.30 | +0.7 | 0.94 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46' | William Osula | 0.51 | Jacob Murphy | |
| 57' | Harvey Barnes | 0.12 | Amar Dedic |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2' | Jean-Philippe Mateta | 0.71 | saved, from a set piece | |
| 46' | William Osula | 0.51 | goal | |
| 53' | Harvey Barnes | 0.37 | blocked |
Shots: Crystal Palace 17, Newcastle United 10; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 2.
In the first half xG was Crystal Palace 1.86, Newcastle United 0.18: a big edge for Crystal Palace. In the second half xG was Crystal Palace 0.36, Newcastle United 1.13: a small edge for Newcastle United. The edge in chances passed from Crystal Palace to Newcastle United. Crystal Palace scored 0 from 2.03 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Crystal Palace: −2.5 for the season (20 in the table). Newcastle United: +2.1 (12). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.