Fulham
Hull CityThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Fulham was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32' | Alex Iwobi | 0.06 | Sander Berge |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73' | Gonzalo García | 0.54 | hit the woodwork, header | |
| 57' | Alex Iwobi | 0.37 | saved | |
| 52' | Joshua King | 0.35 | saved |
Shots: Fulham 18, Hull City 5; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 0.
In the first half xG was Fulham 0.87, Hull City 0.05: a clear edge for Fulham. In the second half xG was Fulham 1.47, Hull City 0.07: a clear edge for Fulham. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Fulham scored 1 from 2.27 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Fulham: −3.9 for the season (15 in the table). Hull City: +2.0 (13). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.