Manchester City
Ipswich TownThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Manchester City was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4.01 | −1.0 | 2.56 | |
| 2 | 1.37 | +0.6 | 0.34 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18' | Phil Foden | 0.64 | Jéremy Doku | |
| 20' | Daizen Maeda | 0.17 | Guemissongui Ouattara | |
| 33' | Erling Haaland | 0.34 | Mateo Kovacic | |
| 68' | Erling Haaland | 0.65 | Iliman Ndiaye | |
| 89' | Zian Flemming (penalty) | 0.76 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68' | Erling Haaland | 0.65 | goal | |
| 18' | Phil Foden | 0.64 | goal | |
| 84' | Iliman Ndiaye | 0.57 | hit the woodwork |
Shots: Manchester City 19, Ipswich Town 8; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 6 and 1.
In the first half xG was Manchester City 1.46, Ipswich Town 0.18: a clear edge for Manchester City. In the second half xG was Manchester City 2.57, Ipswich Town 1.18: a clear edge for Manchester City. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Manchester City scored 3 from 4.01 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Manchester City: +0.1 for the season (3 in the table). Ipswich Town: +0.8 (14). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.