Newcastle United
Aston VillaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Aston Villa was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.92 | −0.9 | 0.67 | |
| 1 | 2.08 | −1.1 | 2.13 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35' | Johan Manzambi | 0.43 | João Gomes |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35' | Johan Manzambi | 0.43 | goal, header | |
| 8' | Nicolas Jackson | 0.36 | saved | |
| 82' | Ibrahim Mbaye | 0.28 | off target |
Shots: Newcastle United 16, Aston Villa 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 2.
In the first half xG was Newcastle United 0.29, Aston Villa 1.11: a clear edge for Aston Villa. In the second half xG was Newcastle United 0.63, Aston Villa 0.98: a small edge for Aston Villa. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Aston Villa scored 1 from 2.08 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Newcastle United: +2.1 for the season (12 in the table). Aston Villa: +2.5 (10). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.