Ipswich Town
SunderlandThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Ipswich Town was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1.58 | +0.4 | 1.65 | |
| 1 | 1.18 | −0.2 | 1.10 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23' | Emersonn | 0.57 | Julio Enciso | |
| 38' | Nilson Angulo | 0.08 | ||
| 89' | Jack Clarke | 0.06 | Sasa Lukic |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49' | Daizen Maeda | 0.62 | off target, header | |
| 23' | Emersonn | 0.57 | goal | |
| 3' | Brian Brobbey | 0.50 | blocked |
Shots: Ipswich Town 10, Sunderland 11; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 1.
In the first half xG was Ipswich Town 0.75, Sunderland 0.99: about even. In the second half xG was Ipswich Town 0.84, Sunderland 0.20: a small edge for Ipswich Town.
Ipswich Town: +0.8 for the season (14 in the table). Sunderland: −6.2 (19). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.