Tottenham Hotspur
Crystal PalaceThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Tottenham Hotspur was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3.72 | −1.7 | 2.92 | |
| 0 | 0.14 | −0.1 | 0.05 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24' | Archie Gray | 0.21 | Mohammed Kudus | |
| 72' | Jan Paul van Hecke | 0.70 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72' | Jan Paul van Hecke | 0.70 | goal, header, from a corner | |
| 89' | Mohammed Kudus | 0.47 | off target | |
| 70' | Andrew Robertson | 0.36 | saved |
Shots: Tottenham Hotspur 34, Crystal Palace 2; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 4 and 0.
In the first half xG was Tottenham Hotspur 0.72, Crystal Palace 0.04: a small edge for Tottenham Hotspur. In the second half xG was Tottenham Hotspur 3.34, Crystal Palace 0.09: a big edge for Tottenham Hotspur. The edge in chances lasted the whole match. Tottenham Hotspur scored 2 from 3.72 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Tottenham Hotspur: −2.3 for the season (11 in the table). Crystal Palace: −2.5 (20). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.