Toulouse
Le HavreThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Toulouse was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48' | Casper Tengstedt (penalty) | 0.76 | ||
| 50' | Casper Tengstedt | 0.32 | Thomas Jørgensen | |
| 70' | Josh Maja | 0.33 | Sota Nakamura | |
| 78' | Thomas Jørgensen | 0.31 | Cristian Cásseres Jr. | |
| 87' | Mbwana Samatta | 0.63 |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87' | Mbwana Samatta | 0.63 | goal | |
| 89' | Santiago Hidalgo | 0.44 | blocked | |
| 15' | Rayan Fofana | 0.36 | saved |
Shots: Toulouse 14, Le Havre 18; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 5 and 3.
In the first half xG was Toulouse 0.59, Le Havre 0.96: a small edge for Le Havre. In the second half xG was Toulouse 2.25, Le Havre 1.28: a clear edge for Toulouse. The edge in chances passed from Le Havre to Toulouse.
Toulouse: −5.0 for the season (12 in the table). Le Havre: −8.0 (18). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.