Paris FC
StrasbourgThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Paris FC was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.91 | +1.1 | 1.95 | |
| 1 | 0.23 | +0.8 | 0.66 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17' | Ilan Kebbal | 0.05 | Lassine Sinayoko | |
| 56' | Pablo Pagis | 0.12 | Maxime Lopez | |
| 87' | Mamadou Mbow (own goal) | — |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56' | Pablo Pagis | 0.12 | goal | |
| 4' | Lassine Sinayoko | 0.11 | saved | |
| 45' | Pablo Pagis | 0.10 | blocked |
Shots: Paris FC 17, Strasbourg 5; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Paris FC 0.61, Strasbourg 0.00: a small edge for Paris FC. In the second half xG was Paris FC 0.28, Strasbourg 0.23: about even. Paris FC scored 2 from 0.91 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Paris FC: +0.2 for the season (3 in the table). Strasbourg: −0.3 (13). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.