Krasnodar
ZenitThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Zenit was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.29 | Douglas Santos | |
| 48' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.04 | Pedro Henrique | |
| 52' | Alexander Sobolev | 0.62 | Pedro Henrique | |
| 54' | Batxi | 0.36 | ||
| 70' | Jhon Córdoba | 0.11 | Ilya Vakhanla |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52' | Alexander Sobolev | 0.62 | goal, header | |
| 54' | Batxi | 0.36 | goal | |
| 39' | Maksim Glushenkov | 0.29 | goal |
Shots: Krasnodar 14, Zenit 15; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Krasnodar 0.20, Zenit 0.66: a small edge for Zenit. In the second half xG was Krasnodar 0.85, Zenit 0.88: about even. Zenit scored 3 from 1.54 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Krasnodar: +6.6 for the season (4 in the table). Zenit: +5.4 (1). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.