Spartak Moscow
ZenitThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Spartak Moscow was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.81 | +1.2 | 1.53 | |
| 0 | 0.56 | −0.6 | 1.08 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11' | Wilmar Barrios (own goal) | — | ||
| 37' | Roman Zobnin | 0.04 | Marquinhos |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19' | Pablo Solari | 0.21 | off target | |
| 74' | Felipe Augusto | 0.10 | saved, header, from a corner | |
| 93' | Danil Prutsev | 0.10 | saved |
Shots: Spartak Moscow 15, Zenit 13; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 0.
In the first half xG was Spartak Moscow 0.50, Zenit 0.05: a small edge for Spartak Moscow. In the second half xG was Spartak Moscow 0.30, Zenit 0.49: about even. Spartak Moscow scored 2 from 0.81 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Spartak Moscow: +1.5 for the season (3 in the table). Zenit: +5.4 (1). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.