Nottingham Forest
Coventry CityThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Nottingham Forest created more (1.32 xG against 0.69) and left with nothing.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.32 | −1.3 | 1.84 | |
| 1 | 0.69 | +0.3 | 0.87 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54' | Jay Dasilva | 0.28 | Carl Rushworth |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75' | Igor Jesus | 0.37 | blocked | |
| 54' | Jay Dasilva | 0.28 | goal | |
| 45' | James McAtee | 0.12 | blocked |
Shots: Nottingham Forest 24, Coventry City 10; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 0.
In the first half xG was Nottingham Forest 0.69, Coventry City 0.21: a small edge for Nottingham Forest. In the second half xG was Nottingham Forest 0.64, Coventry City 0.47: about even. Nottingham Forest scored 0 from 1.32 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Nottingham Forest: −8.6 for the season (16 in the table). Coventry City: −0.8 (17). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.