Lille
Le HavreThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Lille was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4' | Dilane Bakwa | 0.29 | Nianzou Kouassi |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67' | Nianzou Kouassi | 0.50 | off target, header, from a corner | |
| 44' | Maurits Kjærgaard | 0.43 | off target | |
| 4' | Dilane Bakwa | 0.29 | goal |
Shots: Lille 5, Le Havre 17; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 2 and 0.
In the first half xG was Lille 0.72, Le Havre 0.30: a small edge for Lille. In the second half xG was Lille 0.60, Le Havre 0.56: about even.
Lille: +7.3 for the season (2 in the table). Le Havre: −8.0 (18). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.