Frosinone
ComoThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
Como created more (2.29 xG against 2.26) and left with nothing.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13' | Giacomo Calo | 0.12 | Romano Schmid | |
| 47' | Giorgi Kvernadze | 0.41 | Romano Schmid |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6' | Tasos Douvikas | 0.50 | saved, header | |
| 12' | Farès Ghedjemis | 0.48 | saved | |
| 47' | Giorgi Kvernadze | 0.41 | goal |
Shots: Frosinone 22, Como 27; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 3 and 3.
In the first half xG was Frosinone 1.47, Como 1.59: about even. In the second half xG was Frosinone 0.78, Como 0.79: about even. Como scored 0 from 2.29 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Frosinone: +5.2 for the season (6 in the table). Como: +3.2 (5). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.