Parma
GenoaThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Parma was the better side by chances too.
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37' | David Romero | 0.07 | El Bilal Touré | |
| 69' | Milutin Osmajic | 0.46 | Lorenzo Colombo | |
| 79' | Pontus Almqvist | 0.41 | Nesta Elphege |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69' | Milutin Osmajic | 0.46 | goal | |
| 79' | Pontus Almqvist | 0.41 | goal | |
| 42' | El Bilal Touré | 0.29 | off target, header |
Shots: Parma 5, Genoa 12; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 1 and 1.
In the first half xG was Parma 0.36, Genoa 0.18: about even. In the second half xG was Parma 0.50, Genoa 0.69: about even. Parma scored 2 from 0.86 xG: more than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Parma: +0.8 for the season (16 in the table). Genoa: +0.7 (13). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.