Werder Bremen
HoffenheimThe score says how it ended. xG says how it should have ended: it is the sum of the chances each shot was worth, not an opinion about the game.
The score matched the game: Werder Bremen was the better side by chances too.
| Team | Goals | xG | Goals − xG | Expected points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1.26 | +0.7 | 1.42 | |
| 0 | 1.18 | −1.2 | 1.31 |
| Minute | Goal | Team | Shot xG | Assist |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56' | Niclas Füllkrug | 0.19 | Karl Hein | |
| 81' | Eren Sami Dinkci | 0.12 | Marco Grüll |
| Minute | Player | Team | xG | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70' | Fisnik Asllani | 0.49 | off target, header | |
| 56' | Niclas Füllkrug | 0.19 | goal | |
| 2' | Ludovit Reis | 0.13 | off target |
Shots: Werder Bremen 18, Hoffenheim 16; big chances (xG 0.3 and above): 0 and 1.
In the first half xG was Werder Bremen 0.31, Hoffenheim 0.48: about even. In the second half xG was Werder Bremen 0.94, Hoffenheim 0.69: about even. Hoffenheim scored 0 from 1.18 xG: fewer than they created. As a rule, finishing like this evens out over time.
Werder Bremen: +2.6 for the season (6 in the table). Hoffenheim: −2.3 (9). The gap between points and xPTS is built from matches like this one.